Jeanie Buss needs to be guided on the Lakers payroll and future before more time is lost. Before the Lakers salary causes them to lose more than two seasons (2021-23).
Jeanie Buss described the 2021-22 Los Angeles Lakers season as “gut-wrenching,” “heartbreaking,” “extremely disappointing” and “hugely disappointing” to the Los Angeles Times’ Bill Plaschke in a recent interview.
Buss said she believes that the front office can build another championship team. “There’s no reason for me to think we can’t win with them,”. MS. BUSS THIS IS YOUR ONLY MISTAKE.
1)”The real question is this really something they needed to do”?”It’s rhetorical, this was reckless and not only doesn’t make the Lakers better but it probably makes them worse. They should’ve traded to get Rajon Rondo back. It would’ve been much cheaper and more effective”.
2)”Here is the first problem with Russell Westbrook joining the Lakers. When Russ is playing on a team that is a first round out in the NBA playoffs his problems don’t show up because his weaknesses on the court only show themselves and matter in championship level situations”.
3)”Russell Westbrook might be the Lakers new point guard but he couldn’t be my point guard. Not a chance. Not if your team has championship aspirations. It’s a mistake”.
4)”Russell Westbrook isn’t a very good defender and he doesn’t protect the ball. He will have many turnovers and this isn’t what a championship contender wants from it’s point guard”.
5)”Russell Westbrook joins the Lakers payroll, making more $$ than LeBron James and Anthony Davis. He has a career assist-to-turnover ratio of 2.07. This will stop a championship contender in its tracks”.
6)”With Russell Westbrook as the Lakers point guard, I don’t like their chances against a team like the Phoenix Suns. He won’t protect the ball or play defense like Chris Paul will“. “These are the things that become the difference in winning and losing when the teams talent levels are comparable”.
Lakers Vice-President of Basketball Operations and General Manager Rob Pelinka is/was a Division 1 basketball player at Michigan, a lawyer and a sports agent.
What he isn’t or qualified to be is an NBA general manager. If he was, he’d never would have absorbed Russell Westbrook’s salary into the Lakers payroll.
This is a “YOU’RE FIRED” type of MISTAKE. It proves beyond a shadow of doubt that he doesn’t possess the expertise needed on the basketball end to be successful at his job.
Pelenka fired Lakers coach Frank Vogel, I don’t know if he needed to be fired but I do know Pelenka needs to fire himself to fix the problem, Jeanie Buss.
What’s going on
I didn’t play college basketball, I didn’t even go to college but if you give myself and Rob Pelenka an NBA franchise with the same talent and salary cap factors, I will turn my team into a powerhouse.
Pelenka could probably get a job and a shovel working at any cemetary in Los Angeles after this.
Then you’d see what I learned last July, Rob Pelenka isn’t qualified to hold down his job with the Los Angeles Lakers.
I didn’t even know who Pelenka was but once I heard Lakers acquire Westbrook, I thought “what idiot orchestrated this”?
Understand if Russell Westbrook doesn’t have the fourth biggest salary in the NBA, this wouldn’t be the killer that it is. Since he does, it’s a death sentence. Calm down Lakers fans, get a different GM and wait three years and you can petition the Supreme Court for a writ of Certiorari and appeal this ruling.
You ain’t the one
As I said I’m not a lawyer or a sports agent, What I am is a person who spent 20 years studying every NBA player and team from every season with film on them. Studying and breaking down the film.
Somewhere after the first decade and before the 15 year mark, I began seeing basketball games like Keanu Reaves see’s Agent Smith at the end of the first Matrix movie.
I sometimes write articles about the NBA’s salary cap and I never write about things I don’t fully understand.
Back to Keanu and Agent Smith, he saw just code. Rob Pelenka acquiring Russ into the Lakers payroll was bad coding. Inconsistency / systematic error. Unquestionably doomed to fail.
The Washington Wizards acquired Russell Westbrook for John Wall in a trade. This wasn’t a bad trade because these two players have the third and fourth biggest salaries in the NBA.
Meaning that the Washington Wizards were already spending the amount of Westbrook’s salary in John Wall’s, who can’t walk down the steps in his own house without rupturing an Achilles Tendon.
The Wizards weren’t affected by the salary cap by making this move, they decided they’d rather have a player who could actually play than one who basically can’t.
On the flip, the Houston Rockets knew what they had in Westbrook and decided that they’d rather test their luck on John Wall and him being healthy and able to play.
This wasn’t the Lakers situation. They just went out of their way to not be contenders and make it so they couldn’t move financially.
I read a few articles released on major publications that say the Lakers can sign a mid-level exception in the 2022-23 off-season. While this is true based on facts, it’s also not possible.
If the Lakers use the MLE, they would become hard capped until June 30, 2023. Using the MLE would but them over the level that they can’t exceed, rendering it useless. They can use a taxers mid-level exception or “mini MLE”
The Lakers are at this projected tax apron right now (if actual number isn’t the projection, it’ll be lower than, not higher) for the 2022-23 with only 7 players signed. They will have to round out the roster with minumum contracts and a taxers mid-level exception since they don’t posses any draft picks.
This makes it impossible to use the mid-level exception but even if they had a complete roster at their number, it would be a catch-22.
I’m a Sixers fan and with 2:40 left in game 6 against the Miami Heat, the 76ers season will end the only way it possibly could, in failure.
I recently wrote an article about the Sixers payroll. I thought who is in a similar situation as Philly? Daryl Morey literally got sold the Brooklyn Bridge in acquiring a declining James Harden (2nd biggest NBA salary).
Don’t get me wrong having Harden in his prime is a nightmare. Same reason I’d never want Russell Westbrook on my team.
The top two aspects to winning NBA championships are defense and ball protection, without them how many points you score is irrelevant.
HOW MANY POINTS YOU SCORE IS IMPORTANT BUT IT’S NOT THAT IMPORTANT. IT’S NOT LIKE IT’S THE DIFFERENCE IN WINNING/LOSING PLAYOFF SERIES’.
The Lakers payroll will be rid of both LeBron James and Russell Westbrook’s salaries after the 2022-23 season. Trading Russ isn’t really an option but anything is possible because we have named a couple general managers in this article not equipped with the proper knowledge to know any better.
The really only option is trading LeBron James or Anthony Davis but is what you’re bringing back as good? You can’t trade one and not bring back the majority of the salary either.
It’s even less for the Lakers salary because they are a taxer’s team. If the Lakers payroll wasn’t a taxers payroll then they wouldn’t have to bring back as much but here is the CBA. What it means is to trade LeBron James’ almost $45 million in salary they’d have to return about $37-38 million of it in trades.
- Taxpaying Scenario —
- Rule — If a team’s post-trade team salary would exceed the tax level, then a traded player may be replaced in the same transaction by one or more players whose salaries together do not exceed 125% of the pre-trade salary of the traded player plus $100,000.
- Example (Team A, Taxpayer) — Assume (i) salary cap = $99.093 million, (ii) team salary = $130 million, and (iii) tax level = $119.266 million. Team A seeks to trade an $8 million player. Team A could replace that player in a simultaneous trade with one or more players making $10.1 million. (125% x $8 million, plus $100,000.)
- Example (Team B, Options) — Make the same assumptions as above, but this time consider the trade from Team B’s perspective. To receive that $8 million player from Team A, Team B could (i) if it’s available, absorb that salary into room, (ii) if it’s available, absorb that player into a pre-existing trade credit (see non-simultaneous examples below), (iii) send out a single player making $10.1 million or less (so that the trade still works from Team A’s perspective), or (iv) aggregate two or more players’ salaries that do not exceed $10.1 million (again so that the trade still works from Team A’s perspective too).